Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Quality of music Is degrading according to some people but it is improving according to some people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Music quality is determined by how much passion is imbibed and how much presumptuously artist is gone beyond conventional music thinking as well as composition ability. Unfortunately due to some external factors, Music Quality is shook and ultimately ended as a degradation in music quality. I will declaim my reasoning my taking three examples into consideration.
First, rapacious behavior for making more money. For instance, now artists and bands are more interested for concerts and shows rather than producing some breakthrough compositions as well as harmonies. Plethora examples are there for this reasoning e.g. Rihanna, Bruno mars, Michael Jackson etc. During early development as artists they put up great passion but it diminished during embryonic state when they gained popularity. Finally they all ended up as a producer of degraded music quality. It effected time which they spent for composing new songs of albums too.
Hence, in addition to greediness, time for composing music is contributed very parsimoniously by new young artists. They want to hit markets with their prolific albums and songs but one True artist is recognized by his music compositions not by how many songs he composes. For instance, there are very less band and artists who is maintaining their composing skills and producing awesome music. Bob Marley is one of legend in music. His passion towards music can be felt by hearing his mellifluous voice and his composed breakthrough music which he produced his own. The result is that he Is still alive in our heart even though he is not in this world.
Finally, collaboration with different music artists is less seen now days. Everyone wants to have their right on music composition rather than working as collaborated artists. Which provides them popularity as well as place in hearts of their aficionados. In old times English artists had collaborated with artist from Spanish, French and Italian etc. Pink Floyd has produced so many songs by collaborating with Spanish artists and finally they maintained 1st place for around six-seven years on billboard because of their versatility in music compositions.
These example states that new artists are more interested in money rather than quality. They spent less time for composing music and major time for concerts and shows. They brought end to collaboration of artists to produce hit tracks. So these examples declaim my reasoning that Music quality is degrading day by day.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-10-06 | tTONY FRANKIE | 90 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work 85
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 69
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 73
- Science is meaningless without religion. 72
Sentence: Music quality is determined by how much passion is imbibed and how much presumptuously artist is gone beyond conventional music thinking as well as composition ability.
Description: The fragment much presumptuously artist is rare
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 396 350
No. of Characters: 2037 1500
No. of Different Words: 212 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.461 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.144 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.778 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.944 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.591 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.305 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.09 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5