TPO 27' agree/disagree. If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.
The most important goal of each person in its life is finding a proper job. There are various ways for each person to find his favorite job. There is a debate that when a person finds a job position, is it better to get it as soon as possible, or he should wait to find a more satisfying job. In my way of thinking people should get an offered job with no waisting time for finding a better one because not only may they lose the current opportunity, but also they will be able to change it in the future.
The first reason which should be stated here is that no job position will be open forever. If people found a job, they should not wait for a better one because there is no guaranty for finding a more satisfying job. If they lose time, they may lose the current opportunity, and all they have is regret. Also, a job may not be interesting at the first glance, but after a couple of weeks, the person may find it interesting. Therefore, some job positions should be tried to understand whether it is suitable or not.
The other point which deserves some words here is that there is no force for doing a job forever. Any job has a compromise between the employee and employer. According to this deal, they determine the salary, the hours of the word per week, and the termination time of the work. The compromise has a specific expiration time that should be re-established after that. The worker has the authority to determine the expiration time and he will be able to quite the job easily after that time. So, the person can get a job, if he dislikes it or even found a better opportunity, he can quite the current job after determining the compromise letter.
To summarize, people should not judge on job opportunities quickly. They should try it and maybe through time the time they like it. Even if they did not like that, they would be able to quit. waisting the time for looking for better opportunity, may cause the loss of current opportunity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
- TPO 40. Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
- TPO 26:Agree/Disagree:It's better for children choose jobs that are similar to their parent' jobs than to choose job that are very different from their parents' jobs. 70
- TPO 28. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 70
- TPO 48 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Waisting
... like that, they would be able to quit. waisting the time for looking for better opportu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4487534626 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51073767741 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434903047091 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3911924341 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5263157895 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42105263158 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318414921127 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120370962547 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677741342917 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225135194987 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518694105388 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.