Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of
technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people
make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
It goes without saying that, modern technologies have changed the way that people communicate with one another. Undoubtedly, the impacts of technology can be seen in various fields and by my reckoning these effects have their pros and cons.
Modern technology provide new and innovative ways for people to communicate in different fields such as parenting, business and relationships. Firstly, parents can be more easily keep in touch with their children throughout a day by means of a tiny cellphone. Secondly, with the expansion of internet and the birth of email system, working communication and interaction took their first steps towards a completely new era. For example, various companies across great distances even in different countries can now have faster and efficient contacts. Finally, people use social media such as Facebook, Skype, etc. to establish a relationship with those who share common interests.
On the one hand, new technology threatens us to strip away important aspects of how people relate. Heavy use of social media can be an effective distraction in the current moment or over a long period of time. For instance, cellphone owners in a relationship or marriage found their partner too distracted by their cellphones. Other than that, overreliance on technology might cause misunderstandings between couples. On the other hand, these developments can be extremely positive. There is no doubt that the availability of new communication technologies has opened the possibility of meeting new people easily an exchanging experiences on a daily basis with people from around the world. Furthermore, giant social networks have elevated this to a completely new level. A level on which we can simultaneously share things from our lives with all of our friends.
In conclusion, it is true that the advancement of technology plays an important role in human communications and I believe that both positive and negative aspects cannot be neglected in any interaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | khan0229 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Priyan ka | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | azinrad | 89 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people Say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your opi 84
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...on in the current moment or over a long period of time. For instance, cellphone owners in a re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39297124601 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13337263485 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603833865815 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8651650125 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2941176471 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179018452653 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564178761033 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451231515382 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109123817359 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239842085846 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.