Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?

Time distribution in education system is not equal for theory and practical. Whereas, Practice and theory both are equally importance in student’s life. This essay agrees that majority of the learning time in school and tertiary education is spent on theories. Practical classes for few subjects in schools, and only limited number of practical class per week support this.

It is a fact that we all have seen in the school that there were practical classes for science and computer subjects only. For instance, there was no practical to show how a mathematics formula is derived or how that formula is useful in real life. All of these points to shortcoming of education system that has less focus on practical.

Looking at university, it is no exception in this case. Though university has practical for most of the subjects, but frequency of the same for a given subject will be always less. For example, when I was to studying engineering, each subjects had only one practical class per week whereas theory for the same subject was taught on daily basis. These demonstrates that, even in higher education also practical have been neglected since long.

Overall this proves that, at all levels of educations practical are either for few handpicked subjects or if at all it’s there it will be repeated only once a week. It is agreed that “What” and “When” is given more important than “how” for a particular subject. Due to this, learning system will produce students in electronics field without knowing how to fix a bulb, same goes with any field of study. It is recommended that, equal or more focus should be given to learning practical skills, which will empower the students to acquire real world skills.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-07 sanjugohel 73 view
2019-11-28 amanda.mosby 11 view
2019-11-28 amanda.mosby 11 view
2019-11-09 Tejwani 11 view
2019-11-08 Tejwani 73 view
Essays by user Ashita Patel :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, as to, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06872852234 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85379413282 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539518900344 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6705260806 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130351361175 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053461537225 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534044628604 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907714845483 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405333977953 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.