The reading and lecture both are about the advantages and disadvantages of the employee working for four-day week. The author of the reading states that if the employees work for four-day a week would benefit the company as well as the employee, the lecturer cast doubts on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading the suggest that if more employees work four-day week then it would require hiring more new employees and it wouldn't require extra cost as the four-day working employee would be given only 80 percent of the salary, so it would be cost effective and decrease unemployment. However the lecturer disputes this point. He says that hiring new employee wouldn't cost effective instead it will cost extra for giving training's to employee and providing them with new computer.Furthermore he mentions that the medical expense would be same for both four-day and five-day working employees and also addition of new employee would require extra office space.
Secondly, the reading states that the quality of the life would increase for the employees working four-day week. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He says that there wouldn't be any job stability for the four-day working employee as the company would expect from them to do the same amount of work as they did in five working days. Hence they will not find stability and this can also lead to no career advancement as they will be working only four-day a week.
Finally, the reading states that four-day working employee would become a better individual. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that the four-day working employee would have higher chance of loosing their job in the time of inflation as they are working for less number of hours.He thinks that there are high chances that they would also loose their promotion.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the four or five -day working a week, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
- Essay - The Sydney Opera House 60
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 70
- The college years are the best time in person's life. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 60
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country other have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken Which is better Give the advantages if each and support your viewpoint 67
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... First of all, according to the reading the suggest that if more employees work four-day we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...equire hiring more new employees and it wouldnt require extra cost as the four-day work...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ven only 80 percent of the salary, so it would be cost effective and decrease une...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...st effective and decrease unemployment. However the lecturer disputes this point. He sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...point. He says that hiring new employee wouldnt cost effective instead it will cost ext...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ee and providing them with new computer.Furthermore he mentions that the medical expense wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ee and providing them with new computer.Furthermore he mentions that the medical expense wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would require extra office space. Secondly, the reading states that the qu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...futes this argument. He says that there wouldnt be any job stability for the four-day w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... work as they did in five working days. Hence they will not find stability and this c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...ey are working for less number of hours.He thinks that there are high chances that...
^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...e are high chances that they would also loose their promotion. In conclusion, alth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02608695652 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54898821001 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420289855072 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.6807151387 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06452816374 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5817301329 0.272083759551 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263374584081 0.0996497079465 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155186190209 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359740227169 0.162205337803 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145702870395 0.0443174109184 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.