The information is showed by table about the average distance in miles traveled per person per years, by mode of travel between 1985 and 2000 in England.
The travel modes that we will discuss in this table are: walking, bicycle, car, local bus, long distance bus, train and the others travel modes.
The table illustrates the distance of the car traveling is more than the other modes of travel in both years 1985 and 2000.
Although the taxi traveling is nearly the least popular in 1985 and 2000, we can see a 50 percent rise in 2000 from 13 miles jump to 24 miles.The table also reveals another sharp climb in average distance of long distance bus from 54 miles in 1985 to 124 miles in 2000, whereas the table shows 50 percent drop in average of distance of local bus from 429 miles in 1985 to 274 miles in 2000.
We can see a gradual decrease in walking and bicycle modes in 2000, however, there is slight increase in train and 'the others' modes.
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- there is information about average by modes travel between 1985 and 2000 in England 73
- there is information about average by modes travel between 1985 and 2000 in England 73
- what benefits do traditional celebrations have for society 73
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...us, train and the others travel modes. The table illustrates the distance of the c...
^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... in 2000 from 13 miles jump to 24 miles.The table also reveals another sharp climb ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 937.175257732 84% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10628602434 2.54303337028 83% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 127.690721649 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 290.88556701 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6804123711 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 16.3608247423 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.316533695 44.8134815571 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.8 76.5299724578 205% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 35.0 16.8248392259 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.2 4.34317383033 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408785149505 0.216113520407 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252262973188 0.0766984524023 329% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180359047301 0.0603063233224 299% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252262973188 0.12726935374 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180359047301 0.0580467560999 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 8.37731958763 205% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 8.71597938144 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 8.54432989691 187% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.