It is thought by other people that businesses can be managed more efficiently within the control of family members. Though a family-run business has a sense of stability and committed leaders, it is not free of drawbacks.
There is a tremendous number of organizations run by a family nowadays, which are in the top rank due to several reasons. Firstly, family-run businesses provide management stability because a family position determines who will lead the company. As a result, there is a leadership longevity which is obviously essential to the continuous development of an organization. Secondly, the commitment of the family members in their own company is incomparable than to non-family firm, since they are sharing common goals. For instance, they have the willingness to perform jobs beyond their responsibility once it is badly needed, owing to the fact that their family needs are on stake.
On the other hand, family businesses are going through some difficulties as well. The foremost downfall is the highly practice nepotism, meaning, only close members of the family are being given high positions. It is inevitable that a growing business needs an expert guidance but due to reluctant of letting outsiders in top positions, the non-qualified immediate family are chosen. As a result, problems will arise when these people are hired with a lack of knowledge, skills, and experience. In the end, the company will suffer. Furthermore, family conflicts commonly emerge. Undeniably, problems are bound to happen within an organization and due to family involvement, issues are hardly solved and finally have difficulty endings.
To sum up, companies governed by families are advantageous as long as members are truly committed and unified, however, when these organizations developed into a bigger one, limitations on traditional management should be abolished to employ expert personnel.
- Some people think that the best way to run a business is within the family.What are the advantages and disadvantages of a family run business? 78
- Some people think that it is better for a country s economy for people to spend money while others believe that it would be better for people to save money Discuss both sides and give your opinion 79
- Small businesses should avoid recruiting young women who do not have their own family in order to avoid paying maternity leave later on To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44781144781 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06874605112 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5736366761 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259018182228 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885223137479 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758105647178 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16545880344 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886002756895 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.