analyze an issue:
"scientific theories, which most people consider as fact, almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as factual with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future."
write an essay in which you take on the statement above. In developing and supporting your viewpoint, consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true.
From ancient time up to now scientists and other erudite have tried to make some explanation for everything that happen in the universe, from physics laws to creatures’ dilemmas, from celestial bodies to tiny pathogens that cause serious diseases. They have called these findings as theories; however, people rename these assumptions as facts. It seems to me that this definition is partially false, and the scientists discoveries must be approved by more strict documents, so people should doubt on every theory, not merely accept it as totally proven facts.
At first, scientist nominate these assumptions as “theory”, which is describes in any encyclopedia as something that is thought to be true explanation and even further investigations must be taken to approve or reject them. In fact, the wise do some special experiments in various situations to advocate their theories or oppose them. When they access to partially supporting answers they publish their discoveries as a special theory to define some ambiguous event. While they do not assure that their theories are trustworthy in different conditions they do not mark them as “fact”. For instance, evolution theory which is contributed by Darwin is one of the controversial theories until contemporary. Some people accept it as a fact, but enough reasons are not provided to completely confirm this theory to label it as a fact. Although scientists might explain the evolution path from apes and chimpanzees to become human being as a part of natural selection, they could not describe about defects in their theory, such as genetic disorders among human beings as a fault in natural environment. Or even some questions are persisting about religious thought about life formation and human creating.
Furthermore, when people name the theory as a fact, it would be difficult to modify their assumptions. Since they define that explanation as a proved reality and could not believe in counteract position easily. In ancient times when people assume that the earth is the center of universe as a fact, such a long time was spent to change that assumption and wise men persuade them that earth is just part of the solar system that turns around the sun.
In conclusion, it is better to see every description in a skeptical view and make questions to form the stable conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-04 | shagha | 75 | view |
| 2014-02-27 | saharpouya | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uestions to form the stable conclusion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, even so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21204188482 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99268247665 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541884816754 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5179829174 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.733333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164232409819 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546213216759 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446794126996 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824262828429 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413518164056 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.