The following two pie charts shows the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting key features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the two chart provided reveals the relative popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Of these activities, watching TV was the most widely enjoyed in both years, at exactly 32 percent in 1985 and slightly lower at 30 percent in 1995. However, by far the most significant change to take place during this year was the increased popularity of computer games. Not a single respondents to the survey rated playing computer as preferred recreational activity in 1985. However, by 1995 the figures for playing computer stood at 27 percent – second widely highest overall. Also more popular in 1995 was talking with friends, at 26 percent compared to 21 percent a decade earlier.
At stark contrast, however, all other activities decreased in popularity. Furthermore, eating out, which was widely enjoyed pastime in 1985, accounting for 23 percent, slipped to mere 8 percent in 1995. Likewise there were also considerable decreases in the popularity of talking family, other activities and as previously mentioned watching Television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-05 | Enkhamgalan | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-15 | Nora Peng | 78 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.Discu 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Somewhere in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'respondent'?
Suggestion: respondent
...ularity of computer games. Not a single respondents to the survey rated playing computer as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 456, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'widely the highest'.
Suggestion: widely the highest
...g computer stood at 27 percent – second widely highest overall. Also more popular in 1995 was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ercent – second widely highest overall. Also more popular in 1995 was talking with f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ent, slipped to mere 8 percent in 1995. Likewise there were also considerable decreases ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, likewise, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31395348837 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81875431332 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1660671385 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168401036649 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831751263898 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10332188243 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175253526682 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136898756488 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.