The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the changes in different ageing sectors of populations in two countries, Yemen and Italy, in the period from 2000 and 2050.
In general, the changing patterns of these countries are relatively different. For Yemen, a number of people ageing from 0 to 14 year olds accounted for half of population in 2000, are projected to decrease substantially to just over a third (37%)in 2050. In contrast, 15-19 age group, which just make up 46.3% in 2000, increase to a anticipated high percentage of population in 2050, with 57.3%. Leaving 60-plus category remain almost stable, ri...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | PRAMODH k | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | PRAMODH k | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | Marielle | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Kimanpreet Kaur | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | raeesashaz | 73 | view |
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 88
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarise the imformation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 45
- Advanced medical treatments are generally expensive People s access to proper health care should not depend upon their level of income All people have the right to access the best medicine available To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinio 65
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 60
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an make comparisions where relevant 87
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 195 200
No. of Characters: 946 1000
No. of Different Words: 112 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.737 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.851 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.649 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.306 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.441 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.7 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4