Without a shadow of a doubt, education is the vehicle, which provides the knowledge about different aspects of the life and engage the students in various topics. It is a controversial question, whether children should work on a project in a group or alone. Not surprisingly, number of controversies are overwhelmed this topic. In my opinion, they should work together on an assignment which is given by their mentor. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, when youngsters do any school work together, there is a room for more discussion. They try to get the material from different sources, and burden of work is also divided equally. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in sixth grade, my class-mates participated in science fair and we decided to make DNA model as a whole group. We all gathered information about DNA from several sources including science books from the library and internet. Moreover, we bought material from the market to make DNA structure and finally, we discuss the topic in detail and did discussion with our teacher. On the day of science fair, we all were feeling confident because of the hard work we put in our assignment and we learned range of things from each other. I learned from my friends, how to be creative in the challenging topics and do presentation differently. We won first prize on that. So, group activity makes you more confident and you become able to retain that knowledge for long time.
Secondly, doing task in a group, it encourages to understand the actual meaning of team-work and we can relate to others. With the advent of modern technology, inflation is increasing rapidly and offices spaces are becoming narrow. After passing schools, when young people apply for the job, most of the organizations want the people who can work with other team members, so that productivity can increase. In this way, such kind of work ethics we can develop from the school and it makes us enable to understand the point of view of other individuals. Therefore, educators should motivate the children to do work with each other.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that pupil should do their work projects as a team, because it helps in command on difficult topic in more creative ways and also learn the value of team-work, which is the potential tool in the future job.
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 81
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 55
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'understanding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: understanding
...y, doing task in a group, it encourages to understand the actual meaning of team-work and we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8567961165 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75542956229 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555825242718 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5180809307 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22615976215 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064227580541 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482526458646 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138506131759 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00795981100667 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.