The reading and the speaking material discuss the topic of how agnostids behaved and ate. However, the speaker discords with the writer for the following reasons.
First, the writer indicates that the agnostids may be strong swimmers and active predators because other types of primitive arthropods are free-swimming predators. Nevertheless , the lecturer claims that the free-swimming must have well developed eyes rather than blind eyes that the fossil showed the agnositids had. In addition, the fossil didn't show that the agnositids did have other sensitive organ that can trace the preys. Thus, the agnositids could not be free-swimming predators.
Second, the writer claims that the agnositids could live on seafloor. On the other hand, the professor claims that the animals which usually did not have the ability to move and localize in one place. The agnositids was found in multiple space, which show that it can move fast and far. Therefore, the agnositids can not dwell under the sea floor.
Third, the writer the agnositids could be parasites. However , the lecturer argues that the population of the agnositids are too large to be a kind of parasites. It was ruled out of the theory.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 75
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e speaking material discuss the topic of how agnostids behaved and ate. However, ...
^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re free-swimming predators. Nevertheless , the lecturer claims that the free-swimm...
^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...agnositids had. In addition, the fossil didnt show that the agnositids did have other...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could not be free-swimming predators. Second, the writer claims that the agno...
^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Second, the writer claims that the agnositids could live on seafloor. On th...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e agnositids could be parasites. However , the lecturer argues that the populatio...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agnositids could be parasites. However , the lecturer argues that the population ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20618556701 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67485164454 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5136569953 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6923076923 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236360074314 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079224228132 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813976256667 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12729029539 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841297578049 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.