The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Since the early Ancient Greek, one of the essential philosophies of a human being was the ability to persuade others. Through this practice, some may think the message content is the sole crucial factor. Nevertheless, it often is the methods of delivering the message that is far more important than the context of a message, which is shown in the examples of feminist speakers and national propaganda.
Two imminent reformers of the feminism movement in the United States are Susan B. Anthony and Sojourne Truth. During their time, it was still illegal for a woman to practice her right as a citizien, especially on voting. Anthony was arrested trying to vote for a presidential election, stating that she as a citizen of the United States, also had an equal right as any other man trying to vote. Although she was not charged by the authorities, she was not discouraged to stop her action. Instead, she became one of the leading figures of suffragettes movement, and began to speak for them. Her well-known speech is referred as "On Womens' Rights to Vote," and through this speech she censured the oxymoronic democractic society that she was living in. Another speaker from a feminism movement is Sourjourne Truth. A black woman, who has been discriminated all her life by her sexual and racial orientation, gave a speech called "Aren't I a Woman." Through this speech, she was able to connect with the listeners at a convention. She found smiliarities between her and the audience, and used emotional appeal, which allowed to sympathize with her agonies. Both incidents of message delivered is through speaking in front of a mass audience. If it were not for a speech, the message would not have given a smiliar effect as it did. While delivering a speech an audience can experience an amalgamate of emotions from the speaker and the audience, which he or she can relate to personal life. If the message was delivered by a letter or a printed media, the same emotional strengths would not have reached the audience.
Another example is found in government propaganda. Through media, the government tries to manipulate the way its citizens think. This method is ubiquitous in any government, but are shown more directly in authoritative states. Taking a look at an example of North Korea, it is clear that the Kim regime is considred hallowed by the people. The message delivered is simple and clear: to follow and never question the leader. The hegemony in North Korea is well aware of this issue. With such tautology of the concept will soon become mundane, and they will soon seek for other entertainment. Knowing this trend, the government employs a tactic of creating an alloy of entertainments and didactic messages. With this method, people are soon persuaded without realizing that it contains political message. If the North Korean government inisted on same method of message deliverance, they would soon confront a situation where the people no longer listened to the message.
However, sometimes the method of delivering a message may hinder the speaker's intended objective. During the 2016 Presidential Election, Donald Trump made a myriad of logical and moral fallacies. He faced an event where he was mocking a disabled person who had a different political background and beliefs. Because the incident was televised, and was available through internent, Trump soon encountered a series of denunciations. If it were not televised, but rather were delivered through other printed sources, his election committee would have predicted a negative response and would have tried to manuver, so he would not be criticized.
Because of the examples shown above, it can be stated that the way of messaged delivered is more important than the content itself. However, this does not necessarily mean that the message does not have important values; rather the delivering of a message will allow the audience to comprehend the issue better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is often
...e sole crucial factor. Nevertheless, it often is the methods of delivering the message t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ferred as 'On Womens Rights to Vote,' and through this speech she censured t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 944, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Aren't
...orientation, gave a speech called 'Arent I a Woman.' Through this speech, s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 952, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...ion, gave a speech called 'Arent I a Woman.' Through this speech, she w...
^
Line 3, column 1142, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'sympathizing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: sympathizing
...nd used emotional appeal, which allowed to sympathize with her agonies. Both incidents of mes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1402, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing a speech an audience can experience an amalgamate of emotions from the speaker and the au...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3324.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 652.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0981595092 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05314661074 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83072164965 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1048.5 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2712318042 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08823529412 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152968003167 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040609091881 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051837691348 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108272620094 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593108673314 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 100.480337079 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.