The line chart illustrates the data about four different recycled materials(paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics)in a specific country between 1982 and 2010.Units are measured in percentage.
As an overview, the recycling rate for papers and cardboard was highest throughout the given period, however plastics was the material which was least recycled in comparison to three others.
It is interesting to note that in 1982 recycling of paper and cardboard was accounted for about 65%, after that, this figure experienced some fluctuations and reached at 80% in 1990. Furthermore, at the end of the period, there was a gradual decrease in recycling of paper and cardboard, at 70%. Secondly, the figure for plastics was introduced in 1986, accounted for about 2 percent, then, there was an upward trend in recycling of plastics until 2010, with 9%.
Thirdly, the recycling rate of Glass containers was approximately 5 % in 1982 and this figure then went up gradually until 2010, accounted for nearly 60%. Finally, fifty percent of aluminium cans with recycled in 1982, then, there was a slight downfall in recycling aluminium cans as of 1986. From 1990 to 2010 the recycling rate of aluminium cans rose significantly and reached at sixty percent.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
- Some schools start teaching a foreign language in primary school years Do advantages of teaching languages to young children outweigh the disadvantages Give your own opinion and examples 59
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- Some schools start teaching a foreign language in primary school years. Do advantages of teaching languages to young children outweigh the disadvantages? Give your own opinion and examples. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
... specific country between 1982 and 2010.Units are measured in percentage. As an ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...recycling rate for papers and cardboard was highest throughout the given period, however pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30882352941 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91856556978 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8468112596 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170466573468 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898197996134 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386289223373 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118058077961 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414543029287 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.