The bar chart compares the figures in millions of the ways to commute to and from an educational institution by various transportation means for pupils within a year two selected periods: 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it clearly communicates that although the majority of the young choose to attend school by walking instead of other vehicles in the year 1990, they surprisingly changed their mind to travel by car passenger in the next 20 years.
To begin with the year 1990, walking is the most significantly famous option with approximately 12.5 million trips which reached a peak of that period of time. The bus was chosen to be the second highest transport for commuting to educational place by the juveniles. In contrast, other choices for traveling were the insignificantly negligible numbers. Nevertheless, car passenger was inadvertently the lowest with only 4.5 million trips
As aforementioned, car passenger staggered to be the most remarkable number, accounting for around 11 million trips which almost increased almost threefold. Unpredictably, all of the options declined at extremely slight figures including the choice of walking with 6 million trips.
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some teachers think that a programme of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students. Do you think the benefits of such a programme would outweigh any disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lion trips which reached a peak of that period of time. The bus was chosen to be the second hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the lowest with only 4.5 million trips As aforementioned, car passenger stagger...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...reased almost threefold. Unpredictably, all of the options declined at extremely slight fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, second, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40983606557 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11642175661 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2207906129 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.428571429 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115686115702 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507806706596 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039936620579 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743071574458 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038983044046 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.