There has always been controversy as regards whether or not tertiary education schools on the campus should make way for virtual classes. I am strongly the opinion that this replacement has both merit and demerit influences for the following the reasons.
On the one hand, I advocate the view that studying in internet-based courses enabled to eradicate the geographic obstacles and far more easy to approach. Firstly, students will have the most opportunity to engage in state-of-the-art class and even as many as famous lecturer in the prestigious tertiary education schools from over the world. For instances, learners are able to study at Oxford University that one of the most reputable of school to broaden their horizon and enhance their skills. Secondly, students can save a large amount of the cost such as moving and saving time to enter the traditional schools. Furthermore, classes on the cyber space are more vivid than physical ones for video, images or audio teaching facilities.
On the other hand, this substitution also entails several repercussions. Initially, enrolling in e-classes may encounter many distractions such as movies, games or surfing the internet while they studied at home. As the result, instead of focusing study, online learners can have proclivity for ignore their lessons. In addition, joining virtual classes can eliminate social skills. The replacement of studying where people can interact with teachers or peers that was erased by their glued eyes on computer in most of their time lead to be isolated.
In conclusion, I strongly of the belief that physical class make way for e-class that had some advantages; however ones is also detrimental to student’ concentration and interaction.
- The chart shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 11
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music.Summarize the information by selecting 79
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 67
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... has always been controversy as regards whether or not tertiary education schools on the campu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t' concentration and interaction.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, while, as regards, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33818181818 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92695876351 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625454545455 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9498300514 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953450721346 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332525444376 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203133831215 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603245391684 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151770115918 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.