The reading and the listening both are about silver coin which brought to northern America by the European explorer named, Norse. The author believes that coin is not an authentic evidence related to history, it a fake currency. The speaker challenges the statement made by the lecturer. He is of the opinion that it a genuine evidence.
First and foremost, the article notes that Maine where the penny has discovered, is thousands of miles away from Northern America, so it is not real proof. However, the lecturer refutes the statement by mentioning that other objects which are important historical pieces are also found at the same place. So, European used to travel a great distance. In this way, this point is not convincing.
Secondly, the writer claims that no other coin found inhabited by the Norse, so, the appearance of one silver coin cannot prove the worth historical sign. The speaker, on the other hand, argues that most of the European had not visited northern America in order to be settled. After exploring the place, they were used to moving back. Further, he elaborates on that they also packed all their valuable things to take back home and coins are also valuable, so they had taken back. Therefore, we found only one coin rather many coins. In this way, the lecturer is not agreed with the idea.
In the last, it is stated that coins were used widely in Europe, not in America, and Americans did not appreciate it as money. In this way, explorer did not bring coins with them. The speech, on the flip side, establishes that even though Americans did not view the coins as money, but they like appealing and attractive objects. Additionally, silver coins are impressive and unique articles which could be attracted Americans and they might be used it as jewelry piece as such necklace and they might be trade the coins. As a result, this statement of the passage is also not fitting in the frame.
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 71
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 81
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 83
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...related to history, it a fake currency. The speaker challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ericans did not appreciate it as money. In this way, explorer did not bring coins ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80780780781 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41540400738 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525525525526 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4790520947 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2631578947 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353725615753 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100686419482 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746844569963 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206099182208 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519573782956 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.