The pie charts provide data about the different reasons why people decide to travel to work by bike or by car.
Overall, on the one hand people choose the bicycle most because it is healthy and less polluting, on the other hand a minority of workers take it because it is faster than driving. It is also clear from the charts that a huge portion of people drive the car for going to work because in their opinion is more comfortable rather than other type of transport whereas the least amount of people consider the car safer than the bike.
As concerned to cyclers, 30 percent of them do so in order to conduct a healthy and fit life as well as this choice is eco-friendly and this percentage is the double of those who choose the bike because they do not have parking problems. Furthermore, only less than 13% of them prefer the bike because it is faster than driving and has no costs.
Instead, the drivers who use the car for comfort reason are 40 percent, which is almost the double of who do it due to the distance to work. Moreover, 14 percent of drivers have other reasons such as the need to carry things to work and the facility on the speed compared to the bike. Only 11% of drivers use the car considering safer than cycling.
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. 84
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 83
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... percent, which is almost the double of who do it due to the distance to work. More...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4025974026 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26453688068 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3551986162 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153219363283 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780389231871 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817324708954 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120376795435 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962027924756 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.