People always look for the things that bring them the sense of self satisfaction. Among all reasons, dealing with daily and similarity duties have the most contribution to ruin this sense. Some people think that repetitive task is better because the new and challenging task takes a lot of energy and also elevate their stress. Whoever, I avoid to deal with repetitive tasks to keep my happiness and internal satisfaction. Ensuing paragraphs explain my reasons for this position.
First of all, it is crystal clear that routine duties kill the creativity. Our mind are so able and complicated but if it does not deal with challenging works consequently its novelty will be disappear. Thus, it is essential to involve with verity tasks to keep our mental creativity. The result of a survey in high schools students in AUT university shows the 50 percent decrease in the mental novelty of the people dealing with ordinary and repetitive tasks.
Secondly, it is obvious that routine works are so boring so, after a while people feel that they are not useful and have not impressive contribution in the society. As a result the sense of self satisfaction in those people reduce dramatically and they have not enough incentive to keep their job. For example, my father works in a toy company as a counter for 10 years. He always deals with a replicated task and he just keeps the job for money but after a tolerating boring years he decided to leave the work and initiated a new and exciting work.
Furthermore, the opponents of the statement insist having similarity tasks help them to stopped their mental pressure and stress and in such a circumstance they can be happy and satisfy their life. Of course, they think true about the relation between challenging task and rising stress but, they ignore the fact that daily work can not satisfied their ambitious and gradually they become depressed and unsatisfied.
In summary, work and daily duties are not distinct from us but repetitive is the thing that discourages us to continue those duties. It is because similarity tasks can dramatically reduce the creativity and also ruin our motive to keep our job or daily tasks. Therefore, I strongly believe that ordinary and routine task remove people's satisfaction so, to be satisfied try to do new and challenging tasks.
- TPO.31 80
- At one high school, more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments. For example, many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments. The school is considering making a change 66
- Both the reading passage and the lecture argues the idea of sending humans to Mars. With this in mind, the author states that there are several problems which could be solved in this project. On the othe hand, the lecturer claims that although this projec 76
- TPO- 42 integrated 80
- tpo 27 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid dealing'.
Suggestion: avoid dealing
...d also elevate their stress. Whoever, I avoid to deal with repetitive tasks to keep my happin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'satisfy'
Suggestion: satisfy
...ignore the fact that daily work can not satisfied their ambitious and gradually they beco...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in summary, of course, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92602040816 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71387210099 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492346938776 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9706694537 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172025597936 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551448771751 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439259657962 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10220699104 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511833290112 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.