In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth. Some people think more money should be spend on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
In recent times, the pollution level has dramatically increased in the world that encourage some people to actively start dialogues with government and private organizations to invest in exploring the galaxy to find alternative place to be habitat in. I am opposed to this school of thought because of the reasons discussed below.
To start with, government in collaboration with industries and universities has not only taken measures but also successfully implemented the technologies which reduces carbon footprint on the environment. For example, in U.A.E, earlier coal (that emits carbon mono oxide) was used to produce electricity which had very harmful effect on the environment. But, nowadays, more than forty percent of the electricity is generated by using renewable energy resources i.e. solar and wind. Furthermore, air conditioning system industry has already started making compressors that use environment friendly gases. For instance, in UAE, government has already banned the use of non-environment friendly air conditioning system and subsidize the use of environment friendly systems.
Secondly, the invention of environment friendly household equipment such as LED TVs and LED lights has not only reduced the consumption of electricity but also has positive impact on the environment as these devices have no carbon emission. According to recent survey, in U.A.E, ninety nine percent people are using these household items. Furthermore, recently, the tesla industry has successfully developed electric vehicles that have zero impact on environment because of no fuel consumption.
To conclude, the government should spend money on promoting the use of environment friendly household items and automobiles rather than investing in space exploration that is not only time consuming but also drastically impact the life on earth if budgets cuts are made to search for new home in unexplored galaxy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-22 | insidematrix | 84 | view |
- Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is this happening? Is it a positive or a negative development? 73
- With a growing world population, one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'. How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 73
- In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
... Some people think more money should be spend on researching other planets to live, s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: E
...on the environment. For example, in U.A.E, earlier coal that emits carbon mono ox...
^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he use of environment friendly systems. Secondly, the invention of environment f...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: E
...ion. According to recent survey, in U.A.E, ninety nine percent people are using t...
^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: ninety-nine
.... According to recent survey, in U.A.E, ninety nine percent people are using these househol...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49397590361 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02898850685 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575301204819 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3142523104 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259516004284 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115589654548 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179579192356 0.0667982634062 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207660731296 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.32292675108 0.056905535591 567% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.