A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans: 1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively, and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school. 2. Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using online material that each teacher will study individually.
To provide high quality education to the students, I think it would be better to train a small group of teachers first, who will lately offer assistance and provide training for other teachers.
To begin with, the process by which the experienced teachers provide lessons to those who have not take part in the training is a kind of communication that contributes to the spread and exchange of their ideas. Those advanced teachers, who were trainers, know quite well about how they managed to improve their skills, and, thus, are experts in teaching newcomers by foreseeing the difficulties they will meet and underscoring the key point in enhancing the efficiency of having class. For instance, educators may not only focus on teaching the related academic knowledge in their major, but are also responsible for enhancing the comprehensive skills of the students such as independent thinking and time management skills, which will definitely contribute to the overall efficiency of study, and further to their future career and life. Through interaction, the teachers may share their ideas about how to cultivate those essential abilities of the students and gain a detailed and comprehensive insight of the teaching method. Therefore, the inexperienced teachers will benefit a lot form the training process.
In addition, the offline training method will contribute to the progress of the excellent educators themselves by providing opportunities to get feedback from other teachers. Actually, it is inevitable for a person to make a mistake even though they are expert in their region, and mistake correction is one of the most useful way to better improve oneself, through which they learn lessons from their past faults and are likely to bear them in mind for an extended period of time. Taking myself for example, until now, I even clearly remember the scene that I stood in front of the blackboard, analyzing a mathematical problem, during which, however, I mistakenly calculated two plus three was six when I was in my junior high school. Trivial as it was, it was this embarrassing moment that rendered me more careful when dealing with minor problems and later contributes to my meticulous characteristic. In a nutshell, the training process, as a examination of the trainers, largely enhances the quality of learning of the advanced teachers themselves.
Someone may maintain that, in this Information age, the teachers may get easy access to the online materials and tremendous amount of information ever-updated via the Internet within a click. Convenient as the computers and the Internet are, it is essential not to overstate the comparative values and neglect the negative impacts of them, by which I mean, they are likely to provide a variety of distractions which may results in a low efficiency in training. Our everyday life is replete with evidence that smart devices distract us from what we intended to do. Imagine when you turn on your computer, a website from your favorite game pop up saying that a bonus is waiting for you to collect and will be due soon. And it is entirely possible for you to click into it and totally forget about time and the task allocated from your supervisor. From this perspective, high-techs are harmful, rather than conductive, to the efficiency and productivity.
To conclude, the offline training method makes great contributions to both the trainers and the other teachers in the school as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Monster_Miu | 90 | view |
| 2018-10-23 | Ziyan Wang | 90 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | zabanfinish | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...s provide lessons to those who have not take part in the training is a kind of commu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1089, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...experienced teachers will benefit a lot form the training process. In addition, t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ly to bear them in mind for an extended period of time. Taking myself for example, until now, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'three' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'threes'.
Suggestion: threes
...wever, I mistakenly calculated two plus three was six when I was in my junior high sc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 946, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...In a nutshell, the training process, as a examination of the trainers, largely en...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i mean, i think, in addition, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2903.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 565.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13805309735 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89680827112 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532743362832 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3921078844 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.277777778 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3888888889 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232071858869 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703665965096 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511105003823 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136138825826 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057111024203 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.