The text argues that the mechanism through which Humpack whales find their route on their migration process has mightily been found. While the text provides some reasons for backing up its claim, the lecturer on the other hand, refutes those reasons by providing some counter-rationale. Accordingly, The rest of this passage is on summing up the three-rationale and counter-rationale given by the text and the lecturer, correspondingly.
First, the text refers us to the intelligence of Humpack whales. It claims that Humpack Whales can exploit their higher level of intelligence in order to find their track and keep it steady by using stars. However, the speech we heard, completely considers intelligence non-related to routing procedures. He brings up ducks as an example; ducks have lower level of intelligence, but they still can find their route accurately anyway, so intelligence is not the required power for finding an animal's route.
Second, the text qualifies the source of routing and finding orientation just to the power of sight. It says that Whales cannot use landmarks on the sea the way that bird use landmarks on land, so they have to look at stars, the only unchanging, visible source they have. The lecturer, however, mentions the earth's magnetic field as Humpack whales source of power to find the correct route and orientation. He bolsters his claim by pointing out bio-magnitudes material in the brain of the animals as their sensor for finding the correct orientation as Humpack whales posses that kind of sensor.
Third, The text believes that sky-hopping, which means fish having their head up near the surface, is a sign of Humpack Whale looking at stars. The lecturer says that sharks do the same thing; however, they don't migrate. As a result, the man on the speech use this fact as a reason to refuse the text's claim. There is also one extra-reason for refusing text's substantiating provided by the lecturer: Humback Whale usually perform sky-hopping during day that stars are not visible.
While the reasons provided be text can lead us to believe that Humpack Whales are intelligent sea animals that can find the correct path using stars, the lecturer provide us with three reasons that refutes text's claims and persuade us that the tool used by Humpack Whales for finding the correct route is a bio-magnitude sensor and has nothing to do with the whales intelligence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sharks do the same thing; however, they dont migrate. As a result, the man on the sp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, anyway, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, third, while, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 397.0 270.72406181 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07304785894 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8216039591 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488664987406 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5265630366 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.875 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279127058902 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100189739219 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638187901543 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179409451659 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036924061023 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.