By and large, it is beyond doubt that honest persons have got vigorous relationships among their friends. In my opinion, however, the opposite is true. This is due to the fact that some problems couldn’t be told to friends and are caused wrong interpretation. In what follows, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons for holding such a view.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is that some issues couldn’t be discussed with friends. It is crystal clear that some problems are related to our privacy. In fact, our private life is more important than friends’ relationship. Moreover, although the main responsibility of our friends is supporting their friends in hard situations, in some special conditions such as family’s problems we have to counter the problems by ourselves. In other hands, we have to prove ourselves in hard family’s issues without our friends. For example, my friend’s parents want to divorce. While I’m the best friend of him, he hasn’t told anything to me. Because of the private situation, he decides to solve the problem in their house. This example clearly illustrates that there are some special issues which aren’t be told to anyone.
Furthermore, if people are honest with their friends, they will be faced with a misunderstanding of friends. It is axiomatic that persons’ visions are different and will be encountered with problems separately. As a matter of fact, the problem which is too important to you doesn’t have any value to your friends, the friends will be interpreted wrongly. Moreover, everybody has got vary friends who are not eligible to lesson anything honestly. For instance, I had a problem with my friend, last term, and I haven’t said the problems to any other friends. So, I’ve decided to solve it myself because I thought that other friends could interpret issues incorrectly. Hence, because of misunderstanding the problems by friends, it is proper to keep some issues in our heart.
By perusing the above paragraphs although lots of people construct their relation with faithful, I personally contend that it is impossible for all times. This owing to private problems and wrong interpretation. I vehemently urge individuals to try to be honest most of the time except especially conditions. A recent study, conducted at Sharif University, reveals that persons who are honest all the time will be defeated because of exaggerating honestly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting the museums is the best way to learn about a country. 70
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, honestly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31139240506 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15302608073 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503797468354 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4547589268 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4166666667 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4583333333 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160883669335 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518828731852 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659864766729 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111432487809 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056074064866 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.