Many languages are disappearing every year. Is this bad for the world or is it helps unify the human race? (Model 2)

The rapid grow of globalization has made the world to small scale. Honestly, this means that the small local languages are in endanger levels. People worry some loss of cultural identity whereas the world with one language as the international language is the excellent way of life in modern era. This essay would argue the topic in connection with the extension of the local language.

The language is a pivotal tool of communication in human life. The colony’s or community’s language is related to local customary behavior or tribal. It is difficult to enunciate the single side without the other sides. Secondly, the disappearance of diversity could change the perception of the world. Thirdly, people who learn local languages can be harmful with the complexity of font and pronunciation. Lastly, a person unsupported with Multilanguage argues that the local languages are not appropriate to communicate well in politics and economics affair.

Indeed, the vernaculars of the local people who are lived in remote areas, it is the basic rule to live in their community. The inhabitants are used the argots to identify the member of groups and they are sent the indigenous wisdom which is derived from the ancestors to modern era. Such as, the philosophy of Greek where is contained font and pronunciation of Latin language to explain the philosophers argument, without real language the aim of the philosophers cannot be explained vividly, it is one of world heritages.

Moreover, the lost of local languages could bring disequilibrium in the world; mankind would be trapped in the narrow of knowledge because the cultural diversity is the necessary of human being. For example, the anthropologist of the Cambridge University argues that the modern knowledge is the result of the classic manuscripts which are contained local languages.

Vice versa, the modern society believes that the simple languages are easy to use for communicating to other people in international level, the complexity of the vernaculars languages are not appropriate in globalization era. Moreover, the world was changed to small scale, now people could connect to other people across countries with using English as international language to share information. For example, the unity of world is able to bring unity, equality, and reduces misunderstanding.

Furthermore, take some discipline, the economics and political development catches benefit of single languages due to global communities use international language to speak. It can be seen the proof; the international trade was enormous scale, and the study abroad was grown significantly. Besides, the political policy from UN (United Nation) was simple to preserve, and the marginalization was lesser degree. Therefore one language is the best way to bound human in the world.

To conclude, the cultural diversity is the inheritance of the universe. After analyzing both views, the disappearance of small languages is the worst trend and people should keep local languages as the heritage of ancestors in spite of the international languages as the primary tool to communicate in the globalization era.