The passage proposes three reasons why the frog has been extinct from the ecosystem and has also offered solutions to each problems. Unfortunately, all the statements are contradicted by the lecturer.
First, the lecture argues that reducing the use of pesticides is not economical to farmers. According to the passage uses of pesticides cause to severe decrease in the numbers of frog so the law should be applied in order to restrict the use of pesticides. However, the lecturer points out that omitting the use of pesticides hamper the business of farmers as it decreases the yield of crops compared to the other farmers who use the pesticides for the betterment of the crops.
Furthermore, the speaker asserts that it is difficult to sort out the problem in every individual frog cause by fungus. Though the passage contends that fungus affect on the skin of frogs which cause dehydration and lowers the populations of frogs. So, anti-fugal medications to frogs reduces the fungus susceptibility to them which helps to prevent the declining rates of crops. The lecture holds that the use of medication to large case is difficult and also expensive as these medication should be carried out to all species of frog with specific example that these will not transfer to their offspring.
Moreover, the lecturer claims that diminish rate of frogs are results of increasing in global warming. It is reported in the passage that natural habitat of frogs are threatened through human activities. On the contrary, the lecture quotes a view of an expert and believes that disappearance of frog and other species are due to the global warming which are unlike to decrease with the stoppage of human activities.
In short, using specific examples and reasons, the lecturer refutes all the statements presented in the passage and suggests that the suggestions provided in the passage is not practical solutions.
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and support your answers with examples 78
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.To what extent do you agree? 89
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...Though the passage contends that fungus affect on the skin of frogs which cause dehydrati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this medication' or 'these medications'?
Suggestion: this medication; these medications
...case is difficult and also expensive as these medication should be carried out to all species of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the passage is not practical solutions.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1214057508 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80372508606 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498402555911 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0201259743 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167389202715 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583331195793 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406852465061 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815436984301 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541230481528 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.