The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by uio on Sun, 10/28/2018 - 08:28

The three pie charts provide information about the percentage of yearly spending by a U.K school at ten years periods starting form 1981 and ending in 2001.

Overall, in all the years Teachers’ salaries are important spending whereas insurance payments have a minor effect. Compared beginning and final values, insurance, teachers’ salaries and equipment spending increased whereas non-teachers’ salaries and book spending experienced a huge decline.

Compared outspending of 1981 and 1991, resources, insurances and salaries of teachers are increased while other spending are experienced the drop. The most increasing spending is teacher salaries increasing nearly by 10 percent during (40% to 50%). With regarded to books, it rose up by 5 percent. Insurance didn’t change too much only increased by 1 percent. On contrary, furniture and equipment outgoings and other worker’s salaries percents were reduced to 22 and 5 percent respectively.

Compared 2001 and 1991, spending of furniture and insurance are nearly four times higher than its 1991 values. All the salaries and resources outgoings decreased by 11 percent and about 5 percent. Compared to 2001 and 1981, all the outgoings has overall upward trend except book and resources which dropped to its three-quarter value.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...he percentage of yearly spending by a U.K school at ten years periods starting fo...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spending experienced a huge decline. Compared outspending of 1981 and 1991, r...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced to 22 and 5 percent respectively. Compared 2001 and 1991, spending of furn...
^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich dropped to its three-quarter value.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70918367347 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1100653124 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8644603847 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136981287117 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583380870809 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631037012463 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105537689137 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700329660162 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.