Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, chossing a perestigus job that can secure our life is more and more difficult than the past. It is obvious that making a wrong decision to select career will completely ruin our life. Some people believe that, huge amount of information in these days can help them to chose the best job that will make thier future bright. However, I disagree with their opinion and the ensuing paragraphs explain my reasons to this position.
First of all, due to the sophisticated and professional life in these age, choosing job that can garante our life and future is more difficult than the past years. Rapid pace of revelution in technology and science in these days need to have a more precise and complex road map in select a career because you have to study more about cutting edge science and based on demanded in future select your profession. For example, my father chose academic education to secure his future, now he is a professor in University. I also put in my father shose and select academic education but today I don't have any job because my country have a lot of higher education people and has not enough decent job for these people.
Second, it is crystal clear that slow rythm of life in past decades made a briliant oppurtunities for people to put time for finding their talents and interests so, they chose their career based on their talent. As a matter of fact, be involve in a job that you have talent on, is a key to be success.
In summation, people always try to find a shortcut and secure way to have a guranted future and selecting a suitable job is a most important way. In the past, it was easier to make a lower risky decision for finding an appropriate job. This is because the rythm of life and the simple age of the past time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-02 | farnaz_E | 70 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | amirbahman | 90 | view |
- model essayshut down The Salton Sea in California is facing a problem that the salinity has been increasing for the rapid evaporation rate. The reading passage has given three solutions while the listening part reveals the leak of them one by one. T 75
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?An organization that provides food and housing to people in n 65
- TPO 33 #1 83
- Do you agree or disagree?in the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 60
- TPO-49 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to job'
Suggestion: to job
...rofessional life in these age, choosing job that can garante our life and future is...
^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d select academic education but today I dont have any job because my country have a ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...rythm of life and the simple age of the past time.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.528125 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43279794874 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521875 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.744667977 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.461538462 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125169950591 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504533486889 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308110542872 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806758071026 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121795022525 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.