The article states that group offers several advantages over individual work and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that group work creates some real problems and refutes each of the author's response.
First, the reading claims that the individual team member can shine easily by contributing to the project and sharing significant ideas. The professor refutes the point the point by saying that in a group work, it is difficult to find who is contributing more and who is just getting a free ride. He provides an example of a project where some worked well and some not. In the end, the job was completed successfully. But, the real contributor could not be found.
Second, the article posits that a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can agree with the solutions. However, the professor says that as there are different types of people in a group with different ideas, they take a long time to make a consensus.
Third, the reading says that taking part in a group process can be very rewarding. The professor opposes the point by explaining that some people are influential in a group and they do not listen to others' ideas. They forcefully move the project in a direction that may not work. In the end, if the project does not work all, each member has to take the blame. Though, some members tried it in different way.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing TaskBurning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmf 90
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing TaskIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 66
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 66
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e real problems and refutes each of the authors response. First, the reading claims ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the point'.
Suggestion: the point
...ignificant ideas. The professor refutes the point the point by saying that in a group work, it is d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...all, each member has to take the blame. Though, some members tried it in different way...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73360655738 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5030316206 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4140307063 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318611199343 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106438055494 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609770840403 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19955717412 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038742502232 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.