Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve others however, believe that the problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take action? Discusse both views and give your opinion.
In general, there are different views on how to handle variety of environmental problems. While some believe that this matter is too challenging for individuals to manage, many others, including myself, state it is a responsibility not only of governments, but also citizens.
On the one hand, there are various reasons to argue why some think individual’s role is not beneficial to protect the environment. The first reason lies in the person’s restricted power to control the reasons of this detriment. Managing some issues such as global warming or Ozone layer depletion is beyond people’s ability. In this circumstance, the importance of related organizations becomes bold and the solutions should be meditated by government. Secondly, toxic gasses which are released by factories are other increasing matter. I meant that to reduce this matter, some rules about limited work hours should be taken by government. As an example, in some developing countries, factories work more than 15 hours each day to produce more products. They do not care whether the air is polluted or not and they just focus on their profit. If related organizations provide a obligatory program which contains 8 hours of work for them, it would be a huge step to reduce air pollution and preserve environment.
In spite of these arguments, in my opinion there are several actions which should be taken by individuals in environmental protection process. Mainly, persons should act like a community to decrease stated matters. In other word, warning each other about the disadvantages of environmental harmful activities should be considered as a moral responsibility for every person. To illustrate, think about one of your friends who prefers throwing rubbish in the street rather than bin. If you make him/ her aware of the hazardous consequences of this disagreeable action, your friend would stop doing this and the waste chemical would be reduced. As a next action, citizens can also prevent deforestation. Deforestation means clearing trees and plants without replanting. By these words, to stop this harmful event, every person can plant a tree. For instance, families might consider one day in every year as a family planting day. In that day, all family members have to plant a tree or a flower in yard, garden or corner of the street.
All things considered, although it seen sensible for some people to believe that managing environmental problems is too tricky for humans, I think that people can do several things to overcome these matters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-03 | Fatimaseyyedi | 76 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve others however, believe that the problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take action? Discusse both views and give your opinion. 76
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve others however, believe that the problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take action? Discusse both views and give your opinion. 84
- TPO 23 86
- TPO 25 70
- the ability to the future job is related to relations 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 891, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rofit. If related organizations provide a obligatory program which contains 8 hou...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i mean, i think, in general, such as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20681265207 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01731220734 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571776155718 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.748512109 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2727272727 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243460388178 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587544204833 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601947057625 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159588280612 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457490086759 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.