Most people argue that the high sales of some popular consumer good reflects the power of advertising not the real need of consumers.
Do you agree or disagree?
Advertisement is not only one of the most remarkable industries but also the most competitive one. Advertisement can change the destiny and selling of a product noticeably. Nowadays nearly all people believes that the great crisis of selling famous brands’ productions is the impression of substantial announcements not the real requirement of public and this is an issue which has caused controversy. In my own stand point of view mentioned topic is apparently true due to being effective mentally and advancement of technology.
First of all, almost all people opinion that advertisements are psychologically so strong that convert real decision of individuals. In this way announcements entice people by convincing people to purchase their manufacture. Furthermore, this imagination will be constructed in people that if they buy this production all of their requirements will be faded. So as much as they spend more money for financial announcement they will earn more and more by confusing people in considering their wishes. Take buying the simplest thing in a shop for example. When you see the goods in a shelf you choose the stuff which is more familiar to you and you have seen it several times.
To continue with I want to mention another cause of this issue. What makes the selling of brand goods fake and unbelievable is the attendance of announcements everywhere by the irrefutable aid of extended technology. In other words, this companies needs their productions to be heard and seen everywhere like our smartphones, laptops, streets and TVs. Furthermore, technology and virtual world will help them to achieve their aim. So if you pay adequate heed, you can observe that adverts are aimed at us everywhere.
All in all, in some peoples’ opinion goods that we buy and consume are not our real wishes but they are the result of drastic advertisements of various compact to expanded companies. I think that it is true. What make it believable for me are the mental power and repetition of them by the help of technology. Although this quantity of adverts is seemingly helpful for companies people are getting bored with them.in this way they have to transform their way of introducing their goods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-08 | golarghavan | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-08 | golarghavan | 73 | view |
- Most people argue that the high sales of some popular consumer good reflects the power of advertising not the real need of consumers. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Should universities admit equal number of male and female students in every subject? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, i think, first of all, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1456043956 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08115265617 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543956043956 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1651851649 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163993343411 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498080025671 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473211664964 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994575615793 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265008908539 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.