Both reading and listening discussed an animal which lived 15o million years ago and known as Pepenonamus robustus. According to the reading first researchment shows that it is a hunter dinosaur. But when you analyze closely evidence speaks different. The reading state that this animal is a hunter and provide several reason of it. However, The speaker claims it is a fallacy and refutes each author’s reasons.
First of all, Robostus which was much smaller than psittacosaurs was size about domestic cat like any other animal which lived at that time. It is not possible to hunt psittacosaurrs or other dinasours for robustus because of its size. On the contrary, the speaker claims that you can say that small size animals can not hunt bigger than themselves. Moreover, these animals bigger than baby dinosaur.
Secondly, article pose that Robustus are more able to scavenging than hunting. Moreover, Features such as size and hunting position show that it does not run after prey and psittacousaurs were an animal who run fast. In contrast, these speaker proclaims that even today there are examples of animals such as have same leg position for instance tasmania devil. This animals can run at high speeds and hunter.
Lastly, One can consider that it is not a prey which actively hunted due to remains of dinosaur bones inside the stomache. There must be some teet mark at the bones of animal that was eaten. Conversely, the speaker opposed it and said that this animal did not use it for shewing
- five days or four days employees 85
- TOEFL integrated writing: The sea otter 80
- Some people think that parents should plan their children's leisure time carefully. Other people believe children should decide for themselves how to spend their free time. Which idea do you agree with? Give reasons for your choice. 60
- Imagine that you are preparing for a trip. You plan to be away from your home for a year. In addition to clothing and personal care items, you can take one additional thing. What would you take and why? Use specific reasons and details to support your cho 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...hat this animal is a hunter and provide several reason of it. However, The speaker claims it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this speaker' or 'these speakers'?
Suggestion: this speaker; these speakers
...re an animal who run fast. In contrast, these speaker proclaims that even today there are exa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'legged'.
Suggestion: legged
...e examples of animals such as have same leg position for instance tasmania devil. T...
^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...g position for instance tasmania devil. This animals can run at high speeds and hunt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97244094488 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53757490108 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590551181102 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7031528308 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9375 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926579330397 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331996732968 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338157095154 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586140021962 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251554665195 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.