In my perspective, it is far better to have a vaiety of knowledge in many areas rather than concentrating on a single area. I believe this because it is impossible to seprate diffrent fileds of knowledge, and they are connected in several concepts. Besides, many discoveies and inventions have spiked by combing ideas in diffrent realms of science.
First, with the develoment of human beings, findings in science have been continously increasing which lead to sepreated areas of science. For example, with the develepment of mathmatics, it has divided into many parts such as Number Theory, Disjoint Mathmatics, Optimization and so fouth. The people who are in favor of a specific section of knowledge may probably want to have a deep underestanding in their favoraite field. They, however, ignore the fact that without knowing a wide range of areas, they woud not be master even in their field. For instance, many recent phsicological advances have discoverd by using statistics metods. Therefore, a phicologist should comprehend statistics as well as his or her own field.
The last but not least is that many ingenious breakthrough in science have created by blending diversity of areas. For example, The father of modern genetic which his name elude me at a moment, use his knwledge in biology and mathmatics to figure out the genetical relationships. It goes without saying he was not able to do that without his versatality.
For all the reasons that I have stated I stongly believe mastering a broad knowledge in divesity of fields can me more useful. Thus, looking at the world more closely, it can be realized that many human achivements would not feasible to exist. Pluse, one who desire to obtain a deep knowldege in an specific area should be aware that he or just their time, and they ought to increase their knowldege in order to better comprehension not only their filed but also the wrold.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. 90
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TOEFL TPO 14 - Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TOEFL TPO 13 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad knowledge'.
Suggestion: broad knowledge
...have stated I stongly believe mastering a broad knowledge in divesity of fields can me more usefu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ho desire to obtain a deep knowldege in an specific area should be aware that he o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.975 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85657137142 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9971603818 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139523535532 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446388757741 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368425849051 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813018439176 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258921192718 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.