The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase in global tourism. Despite the undeniable
economic prosperity it has brought to many host countries, I would argue that the overall
impact of international holiday making has in fact been negative. Two of the primary drawbacks
associated with this trend are as follows.
First of all, global tourism tends to export many negative aspects of western culture. Since it is
only the wealthy who can afford to travel abroad, developing countries like Thailand and
Indonesia have become the playgrounds of tourists from more affluent ones. In many such
nations, this influx of mainly western tourists has brought with it problems such as prostitution
as well as alcoholism and drug abuse. Admittedly, international tourism does have the potential
to foster greater understanding and tolerance between people of different cultures. However,
this is unlikely to occur while it remains such a potent symbol of western cultural domination
and moral decadence.
Even more disturbing, though, is the environmental degradation that international tourism has
caused in many parts of the world. One particularly salient example of this is Great Barrier Reef
in Australia – the countless boats, divers and snorkellers that have visited the reef over the past
few decades have gradually destroyed vast sections of coral. Similarly, world renowned Kuta
Beach in Bali has become heavily polluted in recent years. In order to be sustainable, greater
regulation of global tourism is required.
In conclusion, the challenges presented by the booming international tourist industry are
numerous and complex. Although they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely
that they will be resolved in the foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The past 50 years have seen a considerab...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated with this trend are as follows. First of all, global tourism tends to ex...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral domination and moral decadence. Even more disturbing, though, is the env...
^^^^^
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation of global tourism is required. In conclusion, the challenges presented ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9744040849 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6336996337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7392103057 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146991511174 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475967637069 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035332999143 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398725883646 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046636539377 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.