The bar chart illustrates the proportion of female and male educators in six various kinds of educational system in the UK in 2010.
A short glance at the bar chart reveals that the number of female teachers has decreased with an increase in educational level. At lower educational levels, women had a greater share of teaching post than men. For example, the percentage of men in the pre-school was less than 5%. For primary schools, the situation was almost identical and more than 90 per cent of teachers were women.
The range of male and female teachers for young children were approximately equal. In collage, half of the lecturers were men and half the other women. For university, the number of male instructors was more than female and it is near twice that of women.
Overall, women had more opportunities to educate children. On the other hand, in universities, male instructors were more numerous.
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender ? 56
- The figures five information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories 81
- The graph compares the percentage of theinternational and the percentage of UK student gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK university 60
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96753246753 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77877317672 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1248834194 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169235198416 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073450615992 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739554779108 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125686748214 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840186964454 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.