Some People think that it is necessary to make occupations more open to both genders in modern times. To extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the endeavour of those who were advocating gender equality since the 1950s, both genders can enjoy the same rights, resources, opportunities and protection nowadays. It caused tremendous changes in social and ideological, with both sexes having equal rights and opportunities in labour markets that old generations cannot imagine. Therefore, from my point of view, I agree with the argument that the further expansion of employment opportunities to both sexes in contemporary is vital.
For a start, it can increase the population of current labour forces, which is conducive to one state's economic development. Thanks for the rapid growth of technology that the limitation of physical strength is no longer an excuse to discriminate people's capability for work. Various automated devices reduce the burden on the body. Both genders can engage in any job with a high demand of strength on a body through some equipment like cranes. Besides, people can also harness an automated work platform with a sophisticated computer system to complete some risky work like mining and drilling. It is apparent that with the help of modern technology, both genders are capable of various physical strength requirements of occupations.
Furthermore, people with different genders, who come together as a team, can develop innovative ideas that will keep an organisation thriving. In contrast, companies in many industries are not benefiting from single-sex employees. Gender diversity increases the positivity effect in the workplace. Employees are most likely to feel they can self-promote and communicate their ambitions in the workplace as well as think there is equal pay regardless of gender. As a result, people feel more confident to self-promote, they are more likely to progress in their career. And in the meantime, companies can also benefit from it.
In conclusion, improvements in gender equality and diversity can bring far-reaching and have significant benefits for whatever the society or companies. The time has come for us broaden the range of occupations to both genders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-17 | reginaluna | 84 | view |
- TPO-52#LECTUREHumans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long lifespan have made elephants 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 90
- TPO-45Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and exampl 86
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l strength requirements of occupations. Furthermore, people with different gende...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me, companies can also benefit from it. In conclusion, improvements in gender eq...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04842805548 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596923076923 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9298899585 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164016488128 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501394413566 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381727861584 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928191424134 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105777728766 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.