Nowadays many people become popular by being featured online or appearing on TV. is it a positive or negative trend in your society? Give reasons for your answer and include example from experience.
Lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades. Presently, majority of masses become prominent by promoting themselves online or appearing on TV. Here, I would like to account the positives of this trend along with its reasons.
There are manifold reasons behind this phenomenon. First and foremost, aristocratic lifestyle of eminent celebrities stimulate people to become popular online as well as television. For example, famous celebrity has all the luxury of life such as ravishing car, name and fame, well furnished house and people get easily allure towards their life. Thus, people want live like a famous star. Moreover, some people wants to become centre of attraction in front of society for this purpose they upload their videos on social sites and attain comments and likes. Thus, being popular online or television confer them immense pleasure.
Numerous benefits can be mentioned of this trend. Initially, people can get work opportunities by appearing themselves on TV or online. To be specific, people who are the owner of exceptional affairs can depict their talent by appearing on television. Beside this, they can get two square meal without doing more physical efforts.Thus, ample of masses can get employment. What is more, being famous online require less time as people can upload their vedios by sitting at the couch. Therefore, the idea of become popular through TV or social sites fully holds the water.
To recapitulate, Undeniably, there are some drawback of this trend. However, I still believe that the positives outweigh it's negatives.
- the pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
- the given table shows that children had taken part in different cultures activities in the last 12 months. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant . 78
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities, is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantage of this outweigh it's disadvantages. 56
- the charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant. 56
- the graph below shows average annual expenditure on cell phone or Residential phone service between 2001and 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rst and foremost, aristocratic lifestyle of eminent celebrities stimulate people ...
^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrity'.
Suggestion: celebrity
...ine as well as television. For example, famous celebrity has all the luxury of life such as ravi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... easily allure towards their life. Thus, people want live like a famous star. Mor...
^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes and attain comments and likes. Thus, being popular online or television confe...
^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...eal without doing more physical efforts.Thus, ample of masses can get employment. Wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34523809524 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67483572537 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623015873016 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3896635387 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2352941176 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8235294118 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221137115463 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071145589189 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402858041931 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12210663473 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393755508292 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.