The map below the center of a town called Oslo as it is now, and plans for its development.

Essay topics:

The map below the center of a town called Oslo as it is now, and plans for its development.

The map depicts the present islip town center of a small home town and the figure of islip center after development.

It can be vividly seen that in the present islip center there are numerous shops on the left and right side of the main road. The main road is in the north side of the center. In the south west corner of the center there is a school for children. The park is located in the east side of the center. There are housing area between the park and the school. Some proportion of the housing are situated near the shops.

Turning to rest of description, a remarkable changes could be seen after development. Firstly, the main road Will be changed into pedestrians. On the left side of the pedestrian area the shops is likely to devide into four parts and these will be bus station, shopping center, car park, new housing, there will be the establishment of dual carriageway in the center. No changes will be seen in the park and school area. Housing section is expected to enhance by making new housing part near the park side.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-23 Sushmabenarji 61 view
2019-12-12 Moustafa Noufale 67 view
2019-10-30 Bakhtiyar1 67 view
2019-09-16 Afsik 78 view
2019-07-24 Jenil 67 view
Essays by user Kudrat :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...ng to rest of description, a remarkable changes could be seen after development. Firstl...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50526315789 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35890485882 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484210526316 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1187766539 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3333333333 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140220474581 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571394383936 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729574138424 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135206850959 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917963785927 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.