In some countries, the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50, while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70. It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason, younger workers are to be preferred. To what extent do you agree?
People's opinions differ as to whether the senior employees are responsive to changing social and economic occurring in modern workplaces or not. In my opinion, it is impossible to say young employees are more valuable rather than old employees or vice-versa because both of them have their plusses and minuses.
Truth be told, workers aging 50 years old or more are less productive in their jobs because physical changes occurring with age could mean certain jobs are more suited to a younger person. Especially in high-tech industries such as computer programming where it is so important for employees to have the capability to work with information, numbers, and calculations, being younger may be an advantage. Additionally, young people are very energetic and enthusiastic, so they can react immediately to any situation put across them at work. Additionally, younger workers have been exposed to plenty of group projects throughout their education, making them comfortable working with others. Otherwise, members of older generations may have a tendency to take on too many responsibilities and some can quite stubborn when it comes to asking for help.
However, the maturity and wisdom that comes with older workers are beneficial because of their hands-on experience and their advanced understanding of office regulations. Therefore, in some cases, they can make decisions wisely and properly better than the younger ones. Experienced workers have overcome tough challenges and will continue to do so as well as inspire younger employees to persevere the company go through the tough times and come out on top.
In conclusion, there is no evidence to support employing young people as opposed to those over 50. It would seem that a mix of the best qualities of old and young labors is advantageous to ensure the most productive working environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | Bossbot Apex | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-24 | LUCIALUSO | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000 78
- The process below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapple Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 76
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Peoples opinions differ as to whether the senior employees are responsive to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... any situation put across them at work. Additionally, younger workers have been exposed to p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30405405405 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96114816685 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9936862647 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19314414059 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695152622821 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438731164464 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103212905344 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377832563335 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.