Media is focusing on issues and emergencies rather than positive development which is harmful to individuals and the society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The media is said to be part of what shapes public opinion with its extensive information networks. Much of what people gather from these media outlets are centered on problems and controversies that pay little attention to good stories. While most blame the media for the occurring individual and societal regression, there are reasons to disagree.
Critics are likely to suggest that the media has shifted its attention towards debatable issues in order to gain public attention. Headlines seen lately offer sensationalized political, environmental, or even trivial matters all in order to gather viewership or ratings. Drama, after all, draws the attention of the common folk. This is seen to cause harm as the negative thinking being fed to the people plants the feeling of distrust towards one another. Eventually, this results to public fear that consequently shakes social foundations of trust towards institutions like the government.
Despite this constant attack on the media, the pressure should not be placed on them to create a more positive atmosphere. Although the media is partly a business reliant on popularity, similar to other industries it has limitations that prevent it from overselling products, which in this case is news. The media has obligations to the public, so regulations and policies have been set up by them as well as the government in order to maintain information neutrality. This protects the citizenry from being coerced to take action based simply on the media’s whim. Given that what the media releases is essentially neutral, the issue then lies not on what the media provides but rather how the people and society perceive and interpret the said details, be it beneficial or sensitive news. All along, the public has created its own fears that let society slowly degrade.
In conclusion, the media has remained true to its function of creating awareness while still remaining unbiased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
The media is said to be part of what shapes public o...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
..., which in this case is news. The media has obligations to the public, so regulatio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, then, well, while, after all, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27419354839 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81856673122 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.165404235 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142847227841 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449568242189 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395078716865 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793347422402 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440817905602 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.