The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart delineates the proportion of GDP from IT and Service industry in UK between 1992 to 2000
Overall, both IT and Service industry showed an upward trend throughout the period. IT industrial share kept ahead and grown swiftly with each passing stage. Furthermore, the occupation of Service went up sequentially in the same era. The gap between the two became great disparity in the end.
Percentage of GDP in IT industry was 6% in 1992, being higher than Service industry rate by approximately 2%. two years later, it increased to 8%. nevertheless, the figure illustrated almost remain steady in 1996 and then the rate of IT industry began to grow significantly which is 12% in 1998 and near by 15% in 2000.
Service industry rate was about 4% in 1992, and it uplifted to 6% in 1994, then in 1996 it had a gently jump to around 7% and being ceaseless in next two years. Service industry was widened the gap of ratio to the IT industry in this corresponding period.in 2000, it rose to approximately 8% and being almost half of IT ratio.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
...vice industry rate by approximately 2%. two years later, it increased to 8%. nevert...
^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...%. two years later, it increased to 8%. nevertheless, the figure illustrated almost remain s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
... significantly which is 12% in 1998 and near by 15% in 2000. Service industry rate was...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('jump') instead of another adjective.
...fted to 6% in 1994, then in 1996 it had a gently jump to around 7% and being ceaseless in nex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ndustry was widened the gap of ratio to the IT industry in this corresponding period.i...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75537503278 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5089700568 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848696622774 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334747262499 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513771906555 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810600278787 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843717048066 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.