Are dinosaurs considered endotherm ?
The author states the evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms. As opposed to, the lecturer who counters-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three evidence do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that the fossils of dinosaurs are found in polar regions. This, means that only the animals that have been endotherm could survive in those reasons. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that this evidence do not sure us that these animals during the cold weather could have migrated. Apart from that, those regions were warmer than are today. Therefore, they may have not be endotherms.
The second argument the author gives is that the position of the leg determines that dinosaurs could have been endotherms like other animals with the same physical characteristic. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that the position of the leg under the body was to support the body weight, which was hug one. This is one of the reasons that could strongly support that dinosaurs were not the same as other endotherms.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that the connection between endothermy and bone structure is an considerable evidence. Actually, these bone structure is called Haversian canals, and we can see exact the same structure in animals that are already endotherm. Nevertheless, the professor declares that this type of the bone structure can grow slowly or rapidly. Therefore, these changes are clear evidences that dinosaurs were not endotherms.
Although, the text suggests these three evidence in supporting the idea that dinosaurs are endotherm, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-11 | chinmay | 76 | view |
| 2020-07-01 | nicatkazimli | 80 | view |
| 2020-04-11 | Ammarak444 | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | ilda | 81 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | ilda | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp
- There has been discussion about the possibility of maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or Moon but no in Venus because of inhospitable conditions. The lecturer argues that it is possible if we establish a floating balloon instead of a standing sta 68
- should students wear uniform at school 76
- Question: Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school.Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...are today. Therefore, they may have not be endotherms. The second argument the ...
^^
Line 8, column 106, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...etween endothermy and bone structure is an considerable evidence. Actually, these ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, apart from, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36666666667 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69226652466 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7238243655 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.