The world of television has undergone a remarkable change with the advent of new age technology such as dish TVs and cable connection setups. Varieties of programs are being telecast daily and many believe that such TV shows hold no importance for children. However, I am a strong opponent of this belief.
I strongly feel that TV programs can influence children positively if watched under parental supervision. To start with, many TV channels air documentaries regularly which are of great educational value. For instance, the channels like of BBC, National Geography and CNN provide immense knowledge on current affairs and enhance one's communication skills. Moreover, quiz shows are one of the favourites among children these days. These shows too, widen the sphere of knowledge by providing valuable information on history, geography etc. and that too in a very entertaining way. Furthermore, programs on cooking and health help children acquire good eating habits and make them health conscious by giving them valuable health tips.
What is more important is that these channels act as a source of entertainment and stress busters. For example, by watching cartoon network, children enter into the wonder world and feel fresh and energetic. Additionally, some TV channels run talent shows which provide excellent platforms for youngsters to showcase their talent and nourish their skills. Also, by watching television, kids explore new things, animals and places that they couldn't see otherwise. Thriller movies and shows develop their analytic skills in a great way.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that healthy viewing habits and limited screen time can be a positive experience for children.
- some parents send their children abroad for study.Discuss advantages and disadvantages of this. 56
- Many people believe that television programs are of no value for children. Do you agree? Why or why not? 67
- Some people believe that children's leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. 56
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 73
- Some People Think That For Individuals, Planning For The Future Is A Waste Of Time. It Is More Important For Individuals To Focus On The Present. Do You Agree Or Disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun TV seems to be countable; consider using: 'many TVs'.
Suggestion: many TVs
...er parental supervision. To start with, many TV channels air documentaries regularly wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nowledge on current affairs and enhance ones communication skills. Moreover, quiz sh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ew things, animals and places that they couldnt see otherwise. Thriller movies and show...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and shows develop their analytic skills in a great way. In conclusion, I would like to reit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41791044776 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80370661322 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7092346398 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146431128035 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043040803823 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583033140222 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921424380058 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464162549088 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.