In many countries traditional food is replaced by international food. This has many negative effects on families and societies. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is an undeniable fact that due to the advancement world become a global village. Hence, many international cuisines overtake the value of traditional food so, in this way some people think that this trend has several negative effects on culture. I will support my opinion in forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, international food takes place in the local market. Thus, people can try a different variety of cuisines apart from their regular food. Moreover, individuals can learn recipes of international food which helps them to upgrade their cooking skill. Furthermore, by sharing the concept of cultural food between nations, it makes tourists familiar in abroad. To demonstrate, the number of tourists visits India nowadays so, Indian food market offers universal food like Pizza.
On the other hand, due to the increasing value of global cuisines, people might disconnect with their usual food which affects their culture and in future people will unaware of their traditional food. What is more, for completing the needs of international food government have to export more materials from foreign which affects the country's economy. For example, a recent survey shows that in all over the world, 60% Indian people eat more universal food.
To conclude, after discussing both sides it is clear that this trend has some benefits as well as shortcomings. So, I partially agree with the comment and, I think that the government should maintain the exporting foods and people should keep the balance between usual and unusual cuisines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-01 | salman vhora | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...clear that this trend has some benefits as well as shortcomings. So, I partially agree wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, i think, as well as, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25910931174 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69681215827 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607287449393 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5524389333 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270688438837 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894596108654 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736612873169 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156311563249 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507006232095 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.