Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should
take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study.
courses should be taken by students in each field has always been a controversial issue among education experts. While some people believe that students should only take courses related their field, there are others holding the view that basic science could be useful for all branches. As far as I am concerned, students could be much expert if they have ability on basic science beside related courses. I will vindicate my standpoint hereunder.
The first point that juts out of the mind is the fact that basic sciences are necessary for all kind of sciences. you cannot understand Static course in Civil Engineering, if you have not a view in physics. An example can illustrate this. Imagine when you are doing a structural analysis for a building, you must have an understanding of mathematics and physics, otherwise you are not able to solve your problem. this indicates that, courses of specialty fields are based on basic course and you cannot learn these courses without a view to basic sciences.
The Second point that is worth considering is the fact that, teachers could not teach all kind of problems in a special fields, thus students should have ability to understand new problem, that they may be faced in real world, and they must have solutions for them. this is not possible unless you have a deep understanding of your field. An example of my own experiences can give some light to this issue. In my field, we always apply astronomical coordinate systems, if we have to convert these coordinate systems to each other, we must know about rotation matrixes, that student known that from mathematics. Consequently, students need some tools in their hands to solve new problem at work. these tools, that could be useful, are basic science knowledge.
To make a long story short, students going to study a specific field to be expert in that branch. But in this way they need some other tools, if they want to be a professional person. we discuss some benefits of basic science courses her. specialty courses are based on basic courses and students can increase their ability in work with basic courses. these all shows that a part of courses that students are learning should relate to basic sciences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-03 | saeid.rashidi66 | 71 | view |
- TPO 40 integrated 80
- Do you agree or disagree: The way people dresses is a good indication of his or herpersonality or character. 63
- Do you agree or disagree: It is impossible to always be completely honest with yourfriends? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most importantcharacteristics for a politician or leader is good communication ability. 63
- TPO 42Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Courses
courses should be taken by students in each fie...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: You
...are necessary for all kind of sciences. you cannot understand Static course in Civi...
^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...you are not able to solve your problem. this indicates that, courses of specialty fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... and they must have solutions for them. this is not possible unless you have a deep ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...eir hands to solve new problem at work. these tools, that could be useful, are basic ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hort, students going to study a specific field to be expert in that branch. But i...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... they want to be a professional person. we discuss some benefits of basic science ...
^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Specialty
...benefits of basic science courses her. specialty courses are based on basic courses and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...eir ability in work with basic courses. these all shows that a part of courses that s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, thus, while, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89682539683 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5577961302 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497354497354 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2344200646 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.55 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28404326685 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962507078188 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715072378492 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199195387934 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547262666122 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.