whether or not Pterosaurs were able to fly
The lecture and the reading have contradictory opinions about whether or not Pterosaurs were able to fly. The author of the extract extremely asserts that they were not equipped with required features to fly and provides three reasons to strengthen this assertion. In contrast, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the author of the article's view and denies each of the reasons given in the reading.
First and foremost, according to the reading, Pterosaurs were cold-blooded, so accordingly they had slow metabolism, and following that they could not to produce enough energy which is a demand for flying of animals. None the less, the professor in the lecture refutes this idea and says exactly something opposite to that. In fact, in her perspective, Pterosaurs were truly warm-blooded which have been proven by their fossils' records. They were covered by dense hair like fur which is a sign of warm-blooded animals. Warm-blooded animals keep their body in a high temperature with hair on their bodies. It is not to mention that by such a view, they had absolutely faster metabolism and were capable to supply the very energy.
The professor in the lecture further asserts that Pterosaurs were light which was not compatible with their large body frames. Their unusual low weight was the result of their hollow bones instead of solid ones. This claim rejects the writer's implication that Pterosaurs were as heavy that it was not possible to them to stay aloft.
The text lasting insists that they didn't have large, powerful back legs which are essential for such a huge animal in order to launch themselves. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture counters this by explaining that Pterosaurs were not like birds that just use back legs to walk, in contrast they utilized their four limps. By keeping this in mind, they were not at all in demand of such a back legs, mentioned in the reading, to prepare themselves to fly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | hanieh.azad | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | hanieh.azad | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | lauren1983 | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-14 | LGI | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem. 70
- it is importan to tell truth always 73
- ethanol or gasoline 70
- In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interes 73
- spreading of zebra mussels from europe to america 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ading have contradictory opinions about whether or not Pterosaurs were able to fly. The author...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Nonetheless
...hich is a demand for flying of animals. None the less, the professor in the lecture refutes t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...d of solid ones. This claim rejects the writers implication that Pterosaurs were as hea...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ft. The text lasting insists that they didnt have large, powerful back legs which ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, nevertheless, so, then, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9509202454 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61908587577 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0540335238 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275940459232 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930262755391 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979204006335 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168650489789 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719534547134 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.