Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computers is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computers is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Owing to think, spending money on public libraries is not beneficial since computer technological era has replaced their function. I completely agree that public libraries benefits everyone although there is a replacement.

Firstly, dealing with the issue surrounding the problem of government-run libraries is best solved by taking approach and introducing a new concept to make public libraries its worth. This method will make sure that the next generation will not forget about room filled with books. At this movement, by imparting new ideas to renovate old libraries and make it interesting by asking people to have a tour on books especially the younger ones who hardly know about public libraries By the time they grow there is a chance where libraries may vanish and supermarket or complex will be built.However, maintaining these large libraries may have a huge task bust the essence of reading a book in quite place and smell of the book cannot be regained by computers.

Another point of view which is to be consider is that having a lecture by renowned professors on a subject or storytelling sessions for children and stories about how these libraries came into existence and who built it. These enrich their knowledge about the place. Consequently, the pleasure of reading a book and discussing with friends and colleagues cannot be replaced by e-book which is read any where and any time also it has a built-in dictionary. It is interesting and advantageous but the pleasure of studying a book sitting in corner of the building and enjoying that movement cannot be taken by computer or mobiles.Furthermore, investing money on these is not a waste of economy of the government, in fact money should be spent wisely on the key factors enrich are leading the problems of library and maintaining it.

In conclusion, although computers has made made its impact on every field regardless of education/financial sectors but providing expenditure to support libraries make to cherish by all people and be detox by virtual of computers and live in real world

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-22 Shahrear59 67 view
2019-08-11 mandy.zang 89 view
2019-08-09 Xiao Hao 78 view
2019-04-08 Brian M. Rollins 67 view
2018-12-18 Sagarikahegde 73 view
Essays by user Sagarikahegde :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ryone although there is a replacement. Firstly, dealing with the issue surround...
^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...nd supermarket or complex will be built.However, maintaining these large libraries may ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...not be replaced by e-book which is read any where and any time also it has a built-in dic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
... cannot be taken by computer or mobiles.Furthermore, investing money on these is not a wast...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: made
... In conclusion, although computers has made made its impact on every field regardless of...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, so, as to, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0512505236 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.443702888 49.4020404114 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.5 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.7667163134 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205900975201 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925399687836 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816368924914 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149581054197 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998728651147 0.056905535591 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.