The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table compares how much land was covered by forest of four particular countries in the year of 1990 and 2005 with that in 2015 in estimation.
Overall, it is clear thar the figure for forested land of Brazil remained the highest over the given the period while the opposite was almost true for that of Australia and Chile. Moreover, the period was expected to witness quite a dramatic increase in the proportion of land covered by forest of New Zealand whereas Brazil's experienced a significant drop.
Initially, in 1990, 28.8% of New Zealand's area was forested land and there was rather a noticeable growth by nearly 3% in 2005. this figure was forecast to continually jump to 32.3 % in 2015. In addition, standing at the lowest proportion, 20.4%, in 1990, the percentage of forested land of Chile was expected to rise to a point of 22%.
Of the other countries, in 1990, Brazil had over half of its area covered by forest and became the highest in four countries. However, this figure decreased significantly and was estimated to see a sharp fall but would keep being the highest. Besides, there was a slight drop in the proportion of forested area in Australia from 21.9% to 20.0% which was forecast to be the lowest in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | nle2006 | 74 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | kavi jk | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-10 | Bella.pham | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Huyen My | 41 | view |
| 2017-10-24 | thefirst25 | 83 | view |
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library s membership in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 80
- Some believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and offer your own opinion 89
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 41
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in United Kingdom Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 71
- The chart below shows the average percentages in typical meals for three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...noticeable growth by nearly 3% in 2005. this figure was forecast to continually jump...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72685185185 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5939584176 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8058260408 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199453642574 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967608536945 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059480041761 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149839289177 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629130874795 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.