The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given graph shows the changes in mass of fish and various meat consumption for each person per week over five 5-year periods from 1979 to 2004.

In 1979, each person ate beef in the highest portion among all meat that mentioned in the graph. There were more than 200 gram beef on average that was consumed while jus about 140 gram chicken was ate at the time. During the periods, the consumption for both chicken and beef fluctuated. But the demand for beef tend to decrease that just approximately 110 gram beef people ate in 2004 while chicken consumption tended to increase steadily, 250 gram chicken in 2004.

The consumption for lamb also flucuated during the periods, but this meat was less intersted in 2004. The mass of lamb that each people consumed fell down from 150 gr in 1979 to just 60 gr in 2004. Interestingly, people ate fish in the average remained mass which was around 40-60 gram.

Overall, the mass of each meats that people consumed fluctuated. While demand for four-legs animals tended to decrease significantly, demand for two-legs animal tended to grow up gradually.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2013-11-22 nikilos 70 view
2013-11-12 Yora 48 view
2013-10-18 Dilbar 90 view
2013-09-17 filipinacpa 10 view
2013-09-03 bamsifiore 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

the demand for beef tend to decrease
the demand for beef tends to decrease

The mass of lamb that each people consumed
The mass of lamb that each person consumed

flaws:
Not well organized. We didn't get the clear 'picture' after reading the essay.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 189 200
No. of Characters: 887 1000
No. of Different Words: 97 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.708 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.693 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.351 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.172 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.652 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4