The bar graph illustrates the percentage of the American people and their frequency of consuming in fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013. Overall, the majority of Americans went to the restaurants once a week in 2003 and 2006. However, in 2013, the most sizeable group was the people who ate at fast food restaurants once or twice a month.
The diagram suggests that the percentage of people eating at fast food restaurants every day and never consuming were at around 8 % and 15 % in 2003 respectively before declining to about 2 % each in 2006 and remained steady throughout the period. Beginning at around 17 %, the percentage of people who had fast food at the restaurants increased to 20 % in 2006 and finished at about 16 % in 2013. Almost one-third of the American population (32 %) went to fast food restaurants once a week in 2003, prior to growing by 1 % in 2006 and then decreasing to under 28 % in 2013. There was a fluctuation between 25 % and around 33 % of the percentage of people who consumed fast food at the restaurants once or twice a month from 2003 to 2013. Ultimately, around 13 % of American who rarely had fast food in 2003, but the percentage slightly rose by 2 % and remained constant through the timespan.
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Employees and self-employed: by sex and occupation, 1992 11
- The chart shows the average life expectancy for males and females in 1900 1950 and 1990 74
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your ans 61
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6976744186 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81072945364 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9708710398 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340289804903 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191414032052 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685757128617 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31195196694 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293360533472 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.