National happiness index can be measured by a country's success or economic growth. Do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary society, we are overwhelmed by the fierce competition, and the role of credit cards use has widely sparked the debate around the globe. Many academics contend that cashless society is beneficial for economic development, while others oppose it. this essay will analyze both the aspects of the given proposal before reaching a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there is a cascade of reasons to advocate the advantages of using cards; however, the most conspicuous one is not remote or complicated; it is practical and accessible. it has long been considered perfectly justified by the proponents to assume that electronic method of money transfer plays an instrumental role to increase the security, and to mitigate the crime rate. Furthermore, it is also asserted that cards are easy to carry as compared to notes. A perfect example to support the aforementioned statement is the recent survey conducted by the University of California reveals that approximately sixty percent of the nations worldwide prefer to follow this trend.
there is also, however, a strong argument not to agree with the given proposal. there is a theoretical possibility that account hackers can withdraw the whole money by hacking individuals' account. Another convincing fact to ascertain that in some remote areas, EFTPOS transaction method is still not implemented. An admissible example to suggest is the nation world over have observed a dramatic shift in the opinion of the public regarding this apprehension.
In conclusion, by weighing both sides up against each other, there are strong and valid points on both sides of the fence and a balance should be sought. we should steer the middle course between these two opposing points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | elise1234 | 77 | view |
| 2018-12-24 | binder056@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...icated; it is practical and accessible. it has long been considered perfectly just...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...worldwide prefer to follow this trend. there is also, however, a strong argument not...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...t not to agree with the given proposal. there is a theoretical possibility that accou...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...e fence and a balance should be sought. we should steer the middle course between ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26618705036 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91199881072 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643884892086 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.498293095 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0558486244593 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0166304735485 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185017266346 0.071462118173 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.02992335999 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174752447265 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.